<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Act Now to Preserve Network Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/01/25/act-now-to-preserve-network-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/01/25/act-now-to-preserve-network-neutrality/</link>
	<description>Metadata about *Media* Activism</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian R.</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/01/25/act-now-to-preserve-network-neutrality/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/?p=434#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the other points of view. I imagine there are lots of legitimate business reasons... if you are a business leader. But end users aren't just concerned about getting to their favorite website. Many of us don't want ANY control by ISPs of how, where, when, what, etc we use the Internet for. I think these new controls over Internet traffic by upstream providers (ISPs) could be exploited unfairly even though they might ALSO provide services people want. It's just the sugar that makes the poison go down IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the other points of view. I imagine there are lots of legitimate business reasons&#8230; if you are a business leader. But end users aren&#8217;t just concerned about getting to their favorite website. Many of us don&#8217;t want ANY control by ISPs of how, where, when, what, etc we use the Internet for. I think these new controls over Internet traffic by upstream providers (ISPs) could be exploited unfairly even though they might ALSO provide services people want. It&#8217;s just the sugar that makes the poison go down IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonequark</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/01/25/act-now-to-preserve-network-neutrality/#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonequark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/?p=434#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say, "Red Herring"?  As you might imagine, there are more sides to this debate than the shout of cyberextortion.  Some other points are very legitimate and logical.  Check out http://www.technewsworld.com/story/JpleN6rOQAt971/Beware-the-Double-Definitions-of-Network-Neutrality.xhtml

Maybe even some input some the Cisco folks might apply.  You remember Ciso, right?  They've had some experience on network pipes through the years...http://blogs.cisco.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/360

So I guess this is a dbate which will rage for some time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say, &#8220;Red Herring&#8221;?  As you might imagine, there are more sides to this debate than the shout of cyberextortion.  Some other points are very legitimate and logical.  Check out <a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/JpleN6rOQAt971/Beware-the-Double-Definitions-of-Network-Neutrality.xhtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.technewsworld.com/story/JpleN6rOQAt971/Beware-the-Double-Definitions-of-Network-Neutrality.xhtml</a></p>
<p>Maybe even some input some the Cisco folks might apply.  You remember Ciso, right?  They&#8217;ve had some experience on network pipes through the years&#8230;http://blogs.cisco.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/360</p>
<p>So I guess this is a dbate which will rage for some time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
