Archive for the ‘Silly big media’ Category

A thoughtful response

Thursday, August 11th, 2005

Dennis Howlett over at Bazaarz.com linked to AudioActivism as part of a response to Dave Winer’s slam of the NY Times which I applauded. Here are my thoughts for Dennis. So nice to see a civil discussion. So unlike some personal attacks I’ve read. :D

Thanks for linking to AudioActivism Dennis! Much respect for all journalists skills, hard work, blood, and sweat.

Your friend in San Francisco is right. Many Americans, myself included, are sick and tired of our media. That’s one reason we are making it ourselves. But many of us don’t call ourselves journalist and never will. Complicated and paradigm changing I know.

On the issue of trust it boils down to knowing someone. No longer do I automatically trust those who make news just because they do it professionally. I trust my neighbors and fellow bloggers whom I have met. (physically and virtually) When they trust someone else they pass along that recommendation. It’s this honnest system of transference that is completely and so terribly broken down in the main stream media.

I dream of a day when my next door neighbor will be better informed about events thousands of miles away than any journalist.

You Tell ‘em Dave!

Wednesday, August 10th, 2005

I love it when smart tech folks jump in the fray and tear the MSM [main stream media] a new one. Case in point; Dave Winer says this about the NY Times:

I’ve now gotten three emails saying they recently let a blogger on their op-ed page, but that’s very very different from having a blogger on their op-ed page. Give a blogger a guest slot, great, if you don’t like the piece, you don’t have to run it. But if you have a blogger there regularly, then you have to run what they wrote, and that would change the character of their editorial, it would make their regular writers think twice about taking the inexcusable shortcuts they take.

# Read the rest

And then he wrote this:

And of course let’s not forget the big stuff — they [NY Times] went to war with George Bush without calling him on his bullshit. They need some strong medicine, they’ve acknowledged it, but they refuse to take it. The stupidity of it is that it would sell newspapers, it would make them money, because they’d become much more interesting. They’re just too scared to piss off their world famous reporters, who don’t want to be challenged. They could make their paper interesting, but they don’t want interesting, they want job security. That’s their real problem, that’s where they need to embrace the web, and that’s what they haven’t done.

I freaking LOVE IT! Bloggers and Podcasters are FRESH and make media intersting! :D

John Stewart on the American Tobacco Trail

Monday, August 8th, 2005

“All you need to know about the American Tobacco Trail is that it starts with slaves and ends with cancer.”John Stewart, The Daily Show in response to his report on $1.6 Million of federal money being given to a project here in the Triangle area (Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill) of North Carolina.

Removing TV Cold Turkey

Thursday, July 7th, 2005

On drive home from Philly and the hot disappointment that was Live8 I swore I would remove all of the big media crap in my life. As a first step I resolved to stop watching TV.

Ever since I can remember I have loved the machine called the television. I’ve been physically memorized, dare I say controlled by it for twenty plus years. In college I realized it wasn’t the CONTENT of the programming that compelled me to watch it but the cathode ray tube and its super fast flickering that held me. Persistence of Vision tricked my unconscious some how. Ever see the movie A Clockwork Orange? Remember that scene where Alex is forced to watch images with his eyelids forced open?

The machines the television and the film projector have influenced my creative life significantly. They have been the canvas of my moving paintings. But now the damage that big media has done to global culture is just too great for me to ignore. I can no longer consume them. I fear to use them as tools for art.

I will not support the massive, marketing, money making, media jugernaught that climbs on the backs of Africans to make a buck. They can claim all they want that Live8 was about stopping poverty in Africa, but in the end the rich just get richer off of the suffering of the poor. Now they don’t need to put the poor to work they just speak the names of those who suffer and money appears in the twenty first century robber barons bank accounts. Not to mention all the political power that is gained by a few media stars.

The withdrawal process is going to be hard for me. TVs are everywhere. In bars, in airports, in shopping centers, and on public streets. But I recognize this has to stop somewhere. If my brain’s power can’t be completely recovered from the effects of the TV maybe my future children will not be addicted at an early age. Live 8

Big Bird Saved! For Now

Friday, June 24th, 2005

Yep…it turns out the US House of Reps restored $100 million that they threatened to take away from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Within hours of a new CEO of the CPB being announced no less. The Media Geek asks, “Coincidence?”. I doubt it. Sounds like orchestrated drama to me.. sheer theatrics. BTW, Media Geek is so incredibly informed about media issues. Listen to his show and read his blog.

All in all I still think this fight to save CPB is war against two moneyed interests. Entrenched moderate “Public” media versus right wing corporate media. Yet again the only choice they would let you think you have is a choice between the lesser of two evils. NOT! Media reformists are using the people as activists for THEIR cause. We really don’t have a dog in this fight. Just make the media yourself and ditch ‘em both!

The Paradox of Power

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2005

From TV News in a Postmodern World: Chaos at the Door by Terry L. Heaton.
“And the paradox of power is that discontent increases with opportunities for acting on it. The more the bottom is given the tools to make and distribute their own media, the greater their power; the greater their power, the greater their discontent and, along with it, the opportunity for acting on that discontent. This bubbling caldron of energy is profoundly anti-elitist and anti-institution, because the more the bottom surveys the landscape these days, the more they realize that our culture has failed them, and this energy is palpable in the halls of power.”

Thanks to Doc Searls for sharing the link to this article with us. (and to linking to me recently) Man, I need to spend as much time as it takes to read all that Doc writes and links to.

Save Public Broadcasting by Making it the PEOPLES’ Media

Tuesday, June 21st, 2005

On this subject of saving public broadcasting Doc Searls says, “save public broadcasting by weaning it, finally, from the federal teat.” Jeff Jarvis is saying, “Make it truly public broadcasting, supported by its public instead of by government.” I say HELL YES these guys are right. It’s about time that the people really own what is theirs. For years the federal government has been begging us for our money to support PBS, NPR, etc. and do we have any real say in its content? No…not really.

There is no reason to save the bureaucrats at PBS if they won’t see their audience as customers, producers, and PARTNERS. The stakes are high. If they won’t partner with us, we’ll just make our own media and only trust each other. Imagine a world were no one trusts the corporate/government media? Imagine a world where we talk to our neighbors and they know more about what’s going on thousands of miles away than the TV does.

PBS should broadcast Open content

Wednesday, June 15th, 2005

Getting PBS to put their content under a creative commons license may be imposible but they could just start broadcasting Creative Commons content. Jason Kotel suggest just this in his blog post Putting the public into PBS.

Save Big Bird from the chopping block? NOT!

Tuesday, June 14th, 2005

Isn’t that a cool sounding post title? It was the subject of an action alert ’spam’ :) email I got – minus the NOT! – from FreePress.net. It describes the attacks on Public Broadcasting from the right wing. For starters I will miss Big Bird and the Sesame Street crew if they are forced off the air because of budget cuts. Those happy muppets were a positive part of many children’s lives. But honestly why not just let those arrogant republicans take away funding? Yep you read that right. Let them kill Public Broadcasting! Why?! For petes sake why?

Because our government is owned by big corporations, has been for decades. How can anything owned by a corporation be truly publicly created or owned? Public Broadcasting stopped being grassroots and owned by the people long ago. Let a large void be left in the place of Public Broadcasting. Something better will fill the void. The fundraising for public media in America should be conducted for small, local, grassroots productions. Groups that your neighbors work with.

You might think that the void will only be filled with crappy commercial cable TV show for children with tons of ads. Well, that isn’t the only option for parents. We have community radio for kids of all ages, public access TV for kids, books, sports, music, podcasting for kids, etc., etc. All created by amateurs. Not corporations. Why shouldn’t these community created options replace Big Bird and all other Public Broadcasting programming?

Because I respect the people who work hard at Public Broadcasting I propose a exit strategy for them. PUT ALL CONTENT EVER MADE WITH PUBLIC MONEY INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Give it away. Even better use a Creative Commons license to help prevent Disney from stealing Big Bird and turning him into the next Mickey Mouse. By giving ALL publicly funded content back to the people who paid for it you will ensure a RICH cultural future and lots of media for the public to work with. Turn this tragedy into a positive strategic move. One that will really give the people the public media they paid for.

NPR Reporter’s Equipment

Tuesday, June 7th, 2005

National Public Radio’s Next Generation Radio Training Projects has a interesting bit of info on what gear a radio reporter uses to record audio. Flawn Williams answers a email from someone who hopes to report for radio. There is lots of good info about audio tech on this page. I will warn you that this info is from a pro-broadcasters point of view. Always *listen* to people who have mastered something. They have the wisdom. You can learn something from them. But, excellent masters will always encourage you to question *requirements*. High quality recorded audio can be done with A LOT LESS than the pros tell amateurs. (For example) A big part of this is because of the massive advances in portable audio recording technology. Once you start doing something for awhile and you find out what works you stick with it. Many times at the cost of finding new, cheap, and faster methods that are just as high in quality. A pros requirements are usually informed by endurance needs. They need to be in the field a lot. They need to be able to react quick. They need to go about their work for hours on end. Amateurs, most podcasters, do not need these endurance qualities in their gear. But in all fairness the original question was “What do radio reporters use at NPR?”. [FYI...I ain't saying nothing about being no excellent master of nothin'] :D