<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Audio Activism &#187; Politicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.audioactivism.org/category/politics/politicians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.audioactivism.org</link>
	<description>Metadata about *Media* Activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Podcast Aint Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/03/22/obamas-podcast-aint-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/03/22/obamas-podcast-aint-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting, General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Senator from Illinois Barack Obama has a podcast. It sounds really good. He&#8217;s mostly speaking as if he&#8217;s having a conversation with you. Fortunately it doesn&#8217;t come off like a pre-packaged speech. I really felt like I got to know him better. There is something about the human voice that can touch you this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Senator from Illinois <a href="http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/">Barack Obama has a podcast</a>. It sounds really good. He&#8217;s mostly speaking as if he&#8217;s having a conversation with you. Fortunately it doesn&#8217;t come off like a pre-packaged speech. I really felt like I got to know him better. There is something about the human voice that can touch you this way. But it&#8217;s obvious he knows what he wants to say and has said it before. This podcast is an excellent way to learn about his politics and issues in general.</p>
<p>Now that US national politicians are adopting podcasting &#8211; are they working for bottom up control of government or just using the latest hyped communication medium? </p>
<p>Senators, let me hip you to something. <strong>Podcasting didnâ€™t come about to reinvent radio and PR.</strong> Podcasting was nurtured on the energy of individuals with their own messages. This is the very core of a grassroots democracy. Share more of your process of governing with all the people who live in America. (Citizens and non-citizens) Let them have a hand in your government. Let them be creative! For tips on how to do this look at how local politics are conducted. Iâ€™m talking about a town or county level. Reproduce that nationally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/03/22/obamas-podcast-aint-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A GRIM Report</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/02/27/a-grim-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/02/27/a-grim-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crossposted from OrangePolitics.org
Guest Post by Alan McSurely
Alan McSurely gives an update on efforts to get our member of congress, David Price, to support impeachment of President Bush. Thereâ€™s been a community forum, two meetings with Price, and nowâ€¦
We present the Case for Impeachment on Tuesday, February 28th at 7 p.m. at Chapel Hill Town Hall. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crossposted from <a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2006/02/a-grim-report/">OrangePolitics.org</a><br />
<strong>Guest Post by Alan McSurely</strong></p>
<p>Alan McSurely gives an update on efforts to get our member of congress, David Price, to support impeachment of President Bush. Thereâ€™s been a community forum, two meetings with Price, and nowâ€¦</p>
<p>We present the Case for Impeachment on Tuesday, February 28th at 7 p.m. at Chapel Hill Town Hall. Michelle Cotton Laws and Rev. Robert Seymour will participate, along with Prof. Dan Pollitt and myself. We will be announcing the formation of GRIM, and asking for your help to build the Movement.<br />
<span id="more-460"></span></p>
<p>Since the press reported the massive unconstitutional domestic spying program of President Bush and Vice President Cheney 2 months ago, a spontaneous grass roots impeachment movement has taken off. One poll showed over 53% of the American people favored an impeachment investigation, over 90% of African Americans were for such an investigation, and over 24% Republicans. This belief that our two leaders have committed crimes is well grounded. The men lied to Congress to give them authority to invade a sovereign nation. Their intentional lies, mixed with their massive ignorance of the Iraqi nation and stumblebum incompetence in handling basic governmental functions has led to the murderous mayhem in Iraq that has destroyed the Nationâ€™s leaders, its culture, and tens of thousands of its children. This is a high crime.</p>
<p>The carefully constructed plausible deniability of Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfield about U.S. intelligence forces torture program has been blown. They knew about, permitted, and ratified the most cruel and unusual punishments of prisoners including tying prisoners to waterboards for faked drownings, mocking prisonerâ€™s sexual mores and religious beliefs, and other cruelties that have been photographed and shown to the world. They have ordered prisoners held for years without hearings or charges. These acts have been outlawed by every civilized society, including the U.S. for centuries. Bush knew the poor Black neighborhoods of New Orleans would be wiped out when the dams broke. Bush fiddled on his Texas farm while Black people drowned. Intentional failure to provide equal protection to all citizens is a constitutional violation. These are high crimes.</p>
<p>Bush/Cheney set up a massive spying program that was specifically prohibited by the 4th Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (FISA) after the unconstitutional abuses of the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the Defense Intelligence Agencies were exposed in the 1970Â´s Watergate inquiries. It is such a blatant violation that Republican Senators are trying to blunt the impeachment movement by talking about retroactively making the violations legal. This far-fetched fig-leaf will draw more attention to the impeachable crimes they have already committed.</p>
<p>If such convincing evidence were presented to a competent law enforcement official, prosecuting attorney, grand jury, or probable cause Judge, they would quickly file charges and set the trial date. Taken together the lies, spies, torture and ethnic cleansing in New Orleans is overwhelming. This is the basis for the grass roots impeachment movement.</p>
<p><strong>BUSH AND CHENEY HAVE BEEN CAUGHT BLUFFING</strong></p>
<p>Like poker players who have been caught cheating and who have nothing in the hole, Bush and Cheneyâ€™s initial reaction is to bluff some more. Bushâ€™s handlers send him out to his vetted daily photo opportunities where he tries to impersonate his hero, Ronald Reagan, acting like his hero, the Marlboro Man. But as people jump his right wing ship daily, Bushâ€™s personal insecurities are beginning to take over. Compare his facial expressions when he lies now with how he acted say, six months ago. His frat boy cockiness covers a very short fuse.</p>
<p>As Scooter Libby can begin to hear the jail doors clanging, he and his lawyers are implying that Cheney directed Libby to out a CIA agent Cheney didnâ€™t like. This stressful news was on the Sunday morning talk shows two weeks ago, but Cheney got as far away from D.C. as possible, to a beer party at a Texas ranch with old friends. He was so relaxed he shot a friend in a bright orange coat about 30 yards away on Saturday about 5 p.m. Instead of reporting this shooting immediately, so he could be given a breathalyzer and the forensic and other material evidence could be preserved, law enforcement and the public were not given any facts until after the Sunday morning talk shows and the alcohol were past/passed. Cheneyâ€™s psychological state was revealed by his hostess. She said her first thought, when she saw Cheneyâ€™s secret service detail rushing toward him, was that Cheney had suffered a heart attack. Bush and CheneyÂ´s psychological state is not our concern. Their corporate sponsors will pay for empathetic handlers to approach them with golden parachutes, as they did with Nixon when his lies and crimes became evident to everyone but himself.</p>
<p>The task of the Grass Roots Impeachment Movement (GRIM) is to make it clear to every politician, Republican and Democratic, that the criminal acts of Bush/Cheney must be tried quickly in the U.S. Senate. For this trial to take place, 218 members of the House of Representatives must file charges against them. We are working on the one member we have some control over, Cong. David Price.</p>
<p><strong>AN INTERIM REPORT</strong></p>
<p>The Carrboro Forum: Starting from scratch in mid-January, we held an overwhelmingly successful forum, Â¨The Case for ImpeachmentÂ¨ in Carrboro in late January. At the close of the presentations, Carrboro Alderman to be, Dan Coleman, asked the crowd of over 140 how many supported asking Cong. Price to be a sponsor of House Bill 635, that calls for a Congressional investigation leading toward impeachment. Practically everyone raised their hands, except for the two members of Cong. PriceÂ´s staff who were there. Coleman then asked how many people would support a candidate to run against him, if Price refused to sponsor the impeachment bill. Practically everyone raised their hand again.</p>
<p><strong>1st Price Meeting</strong>: The following week, a dozen people who had attended the Carrboro forum met with Cong. Price and the two staffers who had briefed him on our agenda. He implied the impeachment demand was not â€œmiddle Americaâ€ and said he was interested in requesting a special prosecutor, like Clinton had agreed to Kenneth Starr, to investigate BushÂ´s acts. Price said he got the idea from Al GoreÂ´s recent speech. We asked him pointblank whether he would become the first white Southerner to sponsor Cong. John ConyersÂ´ bill that had about 10 sponsors then. Price asked whether Cong. Mel Watt had signed it. (No.) Shortly after our meeting, Price and Watt had a meeting with a predominantly Black group at the N.C. Mutual Building in Durham. Watt said he thought talk about impeachment was premature. Professor emeritus Chuck Stone polled the crowd as to whether they favored impeachment and about half raised their hands. Stone chided the rest for being timid.</p>
<p><strong>2nd Price Meeting</strong>: We met with Price again last week. He showed us a letter that he and another member had written Bush, asking him to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate himself. We asked, incredulously, did he think Bush would respond? He said no. We again asked him to sponsor the Impeachment Investigation Bill, which now has over 25 sponsors. The only southern sponsors are two Black members from Georgia, John Lewis (the â€œconscience of the Houseâ€) and Cynthia McKinney. We also suggested he and like-minded Members hold hearings throughout the South to educate the people about the crimes and the need for impeachment. He implied he believed coming out openly for impeachment hearings now would marginalize us. We left agreeing that there are many approaches to this constitutional crisis.</p>
<p><strong>Other Developments</strong></p>
<p>Mr. Kent Kanoy, from Carrboro, who works at Duke, filed in the Democratic Primary and is carrying the Impeachment Banner proudly. The Primary is May 2nd. According to experts, about 20,000 votes will carry the Democratic primary.</p>
<p>The first counterattack from Rove to the national Impeachment Movement is that the more we Â¨extremistsÂ¨ talk Impeachment, the more it will mobilize the Republican right wing base for the off-year election. If every time Rove trots out one of his dirty tricks we play into it, we should hang it up.</p>
<p>We present the Case for Impeachment on Tuesday, February 28th at 7 p.m. at Chapel Hill Town Hall. Michelle Cotton Laws and Rev. Robert Seymour will participate, along with Prof. Dan Pollitt and myself. We will be announcing the formation of GRIM, and asking for your help to build the Movement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/02/27/a-grim-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End of Privacy: for Real This Time!</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/01/18/the-end-of-privacy-for-real-this-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/01/18/the-end-of-privacy-for-real-this-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sad reality is that the US Government has been spying on it&#8217;s citizens for decades. (ex. Operation Shamrock where the US Gov. gathered telegraphs) But finally George W. Bush has admited to it. [?!?] Learn more about this subject by reading the following, the NY Times article that broke the story, CNN comments on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad reality is that the <a href="http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/29895/">US Government has been spying on it&#8217;s citizens for decades</a>. (ex. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_SHAMROCK">Operation Shamrock</a> where the US Gov. gathered telegraphs) But finally George W. Bush has admited to it. [?!?] Learn more about this subject by reading the following, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html">NY Times article</a> that broke the story, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/17/bush.nsa/index.html">CNN</a> comments on it, <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/85">Security Focus</a> links to all kinds of stuff. Sadly the media really isn&#8217;t serving us very well with this story. The <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/12/16/133352/79">NY Times says they knew about the story for more than a YEAR</a> but chose not to release it citing national security. </p>
<p>Organizations are now doing somthing about this. The <a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23486prs20060117.html">ACLU</a> is suing the NSA! [Wow!] There is something you can do about it. <a href="http://political.moveon.org/ruleoflaw/">Sign the Move On Pettition to Restore the Rule of Law.</a> Here is the letter that will be sent to your elected representative and the Justice Department. Public pressure works. Especially during a election year.</p>
<blockquote><p>YOUR COMMENT TO CONGRESS AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT</p>
<p>TO: Your Senators<br />
CC: (Attorney General Alberto Gonzales)<br />
FROM: (Your Name and Email)<br />
SUBJECT: Thoroughly Investigate the Wiretapping Program<br />
__________</p>
<p>Dear (Senator/Attorney General),</p>
<p>(Your personal note)</p>
<p>President Bush admitted to personally authorizing thousands of potentially illegal wiretaps, and he doesn&#8217;t plan to stop. This abuse of power threatens the very core of our Constitution.</p>
<p>We demand a thorough and independent investigation of the Bush administration&#8217;s allegedly illegal wiretapping activities, including: (1) appointment of an independent counsel to respond to any criminal activity that may have taken place, (2) a thorough, meaningful and open Congressional investigation, (3) protection for all whistleblowers who come forward with evidence of wrongdoing in this program.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
(Your name)<br />
(Your address) </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2006/01/18/the-end-of-privacy-for-real-this-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VOTE!</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/11/08/vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/11/08/vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today November 8, 2005 is Election Day in Chapel Hill and many parts of North Carolina. We&#8217;re having odd year municipal elections for Mayor, Town Council, and School Board. It&#8217;s a non-partisan election with candidates and incumbent politicians who are mostly democrats.
So this morning I voted. Before I met Ruby and moved to Chapel Hill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today November 8, 2005 is Election Day in <a href="http://www.ci.chapel-hill.nc.us/">Chapel Hill</a> and many parts of North Carolina. We&#8217;re having odd year municipal elections for Mayor, Town Council, and School Board. It&#8217;s a non-partisan election with candidates and incumbent politicians who are mostly democrats.</p>
<p>So this morning I voted. Before I met <a href="http://www.lotusmedia.org">Ruby</a> and moved to Chapel Hill I voted, but I didnâ€™t really believe in it. I didnâ€™t think it made any difference. I just did it because I was taught thatâ€™s what you do. Then in the year two thousand I signed a petition to get Ralph Nader on the ballet in Virginia. Amazingly he made it on the ballot and that year I voted for him for president. It was a first big step towards multiparty election system (more than two serious political parties). More than anything it gave me a sense of hope that our electoral system can actually work sometimes.</p>
<p>In a so called <a href="http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/">Red State</a> like North Carolina having two towns like Chapel Hill and <a href="http://www.ci.carrboro.nc.us/">Carrboro</a> that are so politically liberal is an anomaly. [ Weâ€™ll except for Asheville <img src='http://www.audioactivism.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ] Itâ€™s amazing to me because I never imagined living so long in such a conservative state. After the hell that is conservative Virginia I vowed never to go back. No where else Iâ€™ve lived has fit me so well. Sure we have the Peoples Republic of Berkley, CA and big cities like NYC where just about anything is tolerated but these small southern towns represent me. Chapel Hill is very southern, intellectual, creative, liberal, radical, peaceful, and warm.</p>
<p>North Carolina is called RED because its people historically vote for Republicans to national offices like Senator and President. Aesthically speaking the fact that conservatives and their arch enemies &#8211; Socialist, Communist, and Anarchists &#8211; claim the color red is weird. Itâ€™s is especially odd to me, a graduate of a fine arts program and a very visually oriented person. What does this mean from a social physiological perspective?  Iâ€™m getting side trackedâ€¦</p>
<p>Sadly elections in Chapel Hill and Carrboro are decided by a very small percentage of the people who live here. Elections are won and lost on tens to hundreds of votes. For a politician it is literally possible to shake the hand of every person who votes for you. This makes the races very much a personality contest. Surprised? The polls are open to everyone and people work hard to get everyone to vote, but still many people stay away. Unfortunately, I can understand this. If you donâ€™t feel like voting helps or means anything you just donâ€™t care to.</p>
<p>Now that Iâ€™ve been more exposed to <a href="http://www.orangepolitics.org">local politics</a> I vote with conviction. Local politicians in Chapel Hill and Carrboro actually represent a large part of my values and work very hard to create positive change. Some how these towns have cultivated an environment where we elect wonderful people. Itâ€™s certainly not â€œbalancedâ€ politically. Itâ€™s decidedly unbalanced. But thatâ€™s ok with me. Itâ€™s progressive, liberal, moderate, closet conservative, and left wing radical. Itâ€™s our oasis in a sea of neo-conservative politics. Itâ€™s a semi-autonomous zone of political freedom. I love living here and will vote to keep it progressive and free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/11/08/vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Force Closed Meeting on Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/11/01/democrats-force-closed-meeting-on-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/11/01/democrats-force-closed-meeting-on-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats Force Closed Meeting on Iraq 
WOW!  What is this all about? Are the dems finnaly doing somthing about the Iraq war?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051101/ap_on_go_co/senate_iraq&#038;printer=1">Democrats Force Closed Meeting on Iraq </a></p>
<p><strong>WOW! </strong> What is this all about? Are the dems finnaly doing somthing about the Iraq war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/11/01/democrats-force-closed-meeting-on-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say NO to Roberts on Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/07/20/say-no-to-roberts-on-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/07/20/say-no-to-roberts-on-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/07/20/say-no-to-roberts-on-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any judge who is &#8220;on the record calling for Roe v. Wade to be overturned&#8221; like President Bush&#8217;s nominee John G. Roberts should not be a supreme court judge! PERIOD! 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any judge who is <a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/media/pressreleases/pr-050719-roberts.xml;jsessionid=917946CE670F26298D55771C4C7381DB">&#8220;on the record calling for Roe v. Wade to be overturned&#8221;</a> like President Bush&#8217;s nominee John G. Roberts should <strong>not</strong> be a supreme court judge! <strong>PERIOD!</strong> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/07/20/say-no-to-roberts-on-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save Big Bird from the chopping block? NOT!</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/06/14/save-big-bird-from-the-chopping-block-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/06/14/save-big-bird-from-the-chopping-block-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silly big media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/06/14/save-big-bird-from-the-chopping-block-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#8217;t that a cool sounding post title? It was the subject of an action alert &#8217;spam&#8217;   email I got &#8211; minus the NOT! &#8211;  from FreePress.net. It describes the attacks on Public Broadcasting from the right wing. For starters I will miss Big Bird and the Sesame Street crew if they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that a cool sounding post title? It was the subject of an action alert &#8217;spam&#8217; <img src='http://www.audioactivism.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  email I got &#8211; minus the NOT! &#8211;  from <a href="http://www.freepress.net/action/callcongress.php?a=savepbs">FreePress.net</a>. It describes the attacks on Public Broadcasting from the right wing. For starters I will miss <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=Big+Bird&#038;hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;sa=N&#038;tab=ii&#038;oi=imagest">Big Bird</a> and the <a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=Sesame+Street&#038;btnG=Search">Sesame Street</a> crew if they are forced off the air because of budget cuts. Those happy muppets were a positive part of many children&#8217;s lives. But honestly why not just <strong>let</strong> those arrogant republicans take away funding? Yep you read that right. Let them kill <a href="http://www.cpb.org/">Public Broadcasting</a>! Why?! For petes sake why?</p>
<p>Because our government is owned by big corporations, has been for decades. How can anything owned by a corporation be truly publicly created or owned? Public Broadcasting stopped being grassroots and owned by the people long ago. Let a large void be left in the place of Public Broadcasting. Something better will fill the void. The fundraising for public media in America should be conducted for small, local, grassroots productions. Groups that your neighbors work with.</p>
<p>You might think that the void will only be filled with crappy commercial cable TV show for children with tons of ads. Well, that isn&#8217;t the only option for parents. We have <a href="http://communityradio.coop/programschedule.asp">community radio for kids</a> of all ages, <a href="http://www.thepeopleschannel.org/">public access TV</a> for kids, books, sports, music, podcasting for kids, etc., etc. All created by amateurs. Not corporations. Why shouldn&#8217;t these community created options replace Big Bird and all other Public Broadcasting programming?</p>
<p>Because I respect the people who work hard at Public Broadcasting I propose a exit strategy for them. <strong>PUT ALL CONTENT EVER MADE WITH PUBLIC MONEY INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.</strong></p>
<p>Give it away. Even better use a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/">Creative Commons</a> license to help prevent Disney from stealing Big Bird and turning him into the next Mickey Mouse. By giving ALL publicly funded content back to the people who paid for it you will ensure a RICH cultural future and lots of media for the public to work with. Turn this tragedy into a positive strategic move. One that will really give the people the public media they paid for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/06/14/save-big-bird-from-the-chopping-block-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Politicians Podcasting ?</title>
		<link>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/04/15/more-politicians-podcasting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/04/15/more-politicians-podcasting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/04/15/more-politicians-podcasting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taegan Goddard&#8217;s blog entry Political Podcasts got me thinking. I know John Edwards has podcast, but what about other politicians? After a google search I came up with this BBC article about political podcasts. Seems it ain&#8217;t just the Dems getting into it. Now the GOP (Grand Old Party to ya&#8217;ll heathens. ;D ) Republicans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taegan Goddard&#8217;s blog entry <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2005/04/15/political_podcasts.html" target="_blank">Political Podcasts</a> got me thinking. I know John Edwards has podcast, but what about other politicians? After a google search I came up with this <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4441135.stm">BBC article about political podcasts</a>. Seems it ain&#8217;t just the Dems getting into it. Now the GOP (Grand Old Party to ya&#8217;ll <a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~wodensharrow/hah.html">heathens</a>. ;D ) <a href="http://www.gop.com/podcasting.html" target="_blank">Republicans are podcasting</a>. When the rulers start using new tech, like podcasting, the OFFICIAL herald of mainstream adoption is sounded. All of ya&#8217;ll podcasters are saying, &#8220;Like no DUH!&#8221; Am I right?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.audioactivism.org/2005/04/15/more-politicians-podcasting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
